|
|
||||||||||
| Deer
& Elk Solutions Home Title 1 Title 2 Information Series Products & Services FAQs |
October, 2004
The remedy described in Part 1 is effective but it is not an overall solution. It is essential to recognize that the enemy is multifaceted. Here in Evergreen it is deer and elk; males and females; herds, groups, and single animals; seasonal differences in behavior, such as male mating/hormone aggressiveness in the fall; seasonal foliage differences; and perhaps many other influences. Over the summer during periods of heavy leaf growth some trees were eaten almost entirely and/or cracked or eaten near the top. The chicken wire cylinders remained mostly in tact but were bent or rearranged. What caused the failure is that the trees were growing rapidly, became “rubbery,” and leaves drooped or grew through the fencing. The animals are also quite capable of jumping up. As described in Part 1, almost anything accessible will be reached and gobbled. If the tree is not high enough or strong enough it will be pulled down. Not only does the overall solution require ongoing care, it needs additional strength and height in extreme situations. The chicken wire cylinders continue to be effective, inexpensive, and easy-to-install protection for relatively mature trees.
The cylinders worked about as well as could be expected in the front grove. All the completely enclosed (up to 6 feet) trees survived and grew significant leaves. This was despite some branches which grew to be accessible to the beasts. The grove is also somewhat protected by a snow fence along the front of the hill; a small, very loose wooden fence along one side, and a car sometimes parked to the left. Still, the trees grew skyward and became much, much stronger. Three or four tress only partially wrapped did endure munching; these now need to be trimmed and protected in the method described in Part 1. Recently three of the cylinders were ripped off--two were removed entirely and another was lifted halfway up a small tree. This seems to have been done by deer that appear to dig more aggressively at the base as there was new growth there. Deer have been in the area for the past week or two, including several large males. Still, the severity of the “attack,” as well as the markings/damage to the grass, suggests elk, and perhaps, large aggressive bull(s). Regardless, the cylinders proved vulnerable. The cylinders that failed did so for two reasons: the fencing material and the ties were not strong enough. Following is the solution that has, so far, proved impregnable. This is a remedy for extreme situations both in terms of accessibility and the numbers and sizes of the animals, both of which are the case with the “side grove” described in Part I.
© 2004, 2005 ThinkLikeABeast.com
|